Note: If you are using Peerceptiv in an LMS, please always start by creating an assignment link in your LMS first, and then use that link to access Peerceptiv.
The directions that follow explain using the 'Build a Custom Assignment' settings to create a standard, individual peer assessment assignment. For an easier and quicker set up process, click the "Choose a Standard Workflow" button and then select the Peer Assessment workflow.
In these assignments, each student uploads a product during the submission phase, then rates and reviews peer work products during the review phase, and then lastly may participate in a feedback phase where they read the comments their work received and rate them for their helpfulness.
1. Select Build Your Own Assignment and then Peer Assessment for the assignment type. Next, click Individual Students and click Next in the bottom right.
2. Keep the default Allow Late Submissions unless you have a specific reason for not keeping it. If you do not allow late submissions here, students will not be able to submit late even if they have an excused reason for their late submission. If late submissions are not allowed according to your syllabus or course policies, you may want to set a penalty of 100% but still keep this setting to account for any cases of excused late submissions.
You will set the late penalty later in the assignment creation process. The late penalty is applied to the submission grade and reduces it by the set amount for each day that the submission is overdue. Instructors can waive the late penalty for individual students before the grades are released.
3. Keep the default Peer Reviews unless the assignment will only be graded by the instructor/TA with no student peer review. Select Teacher Graded Only if the instructor/TAs will be doing all of the reviewing and with no student participation. Then, select Next.
4. The Feedback Phase of a Peerceptiv assignment is the third phase where the submitter rates and comments on the helpfulness of the reviews they received. This step holds the reviewers accountable by letting them know how their comments were perceived and how they can provide more helpful comments in the future. We recommend keeping this step for most assignments.
In situations where there is a tight turnaround time before the next assignment or where there will be more than 4 reviewers/submission, the instructor may choose to not have a feedback phase in order to ease the assignment demands on the students.
Note: Do NOT include a feedback stage if the rubric will only have rating prompts and no comment prompts. Your rubric must have comment prompts in order to have a Feedback phase.
5. Confirm and Continue: If the assignment is set up the way you want it to be set, click Submit. Click Previous to go back to an earlier setting option and make changes. Please note that the settings you select in the first four steps cannot be edited later. If you realize that something needs to be changed after the assignment has been created, please contact support@peerceptiv.com about the issue.
6. Details: Add an assignment name and description. If you have a detailed description posted elsewhere, you can simply refer students to that description or post the full description in both places. Click Next to move to the submission type screen.
7. Submission: If all of the default submission types are allowed, students can choose to either upload a file, post a link, or directly type their submission into Peerceptiv (they must choose only one of these methods). To remove a submission type, click on that type and it will not be allowed, as shown by a red X instead of a green check.
Submission notes:
- If students post a link, please remind them to make sure that any sharing or privacy settings are set to allow peer reviewers access.
- Only one submission can be uploaded per student per assignment. If students need to upload multiple files, have them create a Zip file and upload that folder.
- We recommend selecting "Link" for all video submission assignments. Students must upload a link to their video on YouTube, Google Drive, Vimeo, or another video hosting service.
8. Review: Select the number of reviews each student will complete. For individual assignments where grades are being generated, there must be at least 3 reviews per document for valid and reliable grades. In situations where the instructor will be reviewing or the grades are not being counted toward the final grade, selecting fewer reviews per student is possible.
9. Advanced Reviewing Options:
- Allow extra, bonus reviews allows students to complete additional reviews beyond the required ones for extra credit. Each additional review completed will count as 10% added to the task grade. Students can only complete the same number of bonus reviews as required reviews. For example, if there are 3 required reviews, a student could complete up to 3 additional bonus reviews for a total of 30 percentage points added to the task grade. Bonus reviews that are started and not completed are counted against the student’s reviewing task grade. If bonus reviews are enabled, students may get above a 100% for their task grade.
- Allow students who haven't submitted to peer review permits students to review peer documents without having submitted their own. They are not allowed to submit after they begin the reviewing process. This option must be checked in situations where not everyone who reviews has to submit, like in presentation assignments when only a portion of the students submit on a given day and then the rest review those submissions without submitting their own work to that assignment. Students who do not submit will get a 0 for their submission grade and will not be able to participate in the feedback phase, but they will get a grade for the reviews that they complete.
- Require students to perform a self-review will require students to use the rubric to assess their own submission. Their ratings will not be counted toward the overall grade. Completing the self-assessment is counted towards their task grade.
10. Feedback: If the assignment has a Feedback stage, you can choose to accept the default prompt and ratings or edit them to have students focus on the specific criteria that the reviewers should include. It is not possible to remove the feedback stage once it is part of the assignment without contacting Peerceptiv support.
11. Grading Options
- Grading Style
- Curved Grading uses the mean and standard deviation set by the instructor to generate the submission grade.
- Benchmarking allows instructors to set the grading curve based on the highest and lowest ranked submissions. After the reviewing period is over, the instructor will grade 10 submissions. The grades given to those 10 submissions set a linear curve that is used to generate the submission grades for all submissions.
- Teacher Review Impact
- Regular Review means that any instructor or TA reviews completed will count the same as a student review in terms of determining the submission grade. For example, if there are 3 student reviews and 1 instructor review, each review will count approximately 25% towards the student’s submission grade. Instructor reviews are considered to be 100% accurate and affects the accuracy reviewing grade of reviewers in addition to the submission grade of the student whose work the instructor reviewed.
-
- Override Student Reviews means that the instructor or TA ratings are the only ratings that will be used to determine the student’s submission grades. If there is no instructor review on a document, then the student ratings will determine the grade. Instructor reviews are considered to be 100% accurate and affects the accuracy reviewing grade of reviewers even though the student reviewers' ratings do not count toward the submitter's grade.
- Grade Release
-
- Automatic grade release will publish the results immediately after the final assignment deadline passes. If the course is linked to the LMS, the overall assignment grade will be sent to the LMS grade book. Students will also be able to see their grade and the reviews on their document after grades are released.
- Manual grade release means that an instructor or TA must release the results to students, giving the instructor a chance to review and approve the grades before the students see them. Students will not be able to see their grades, their average ratings, or the comments on their submission until the results are released.
-
- Late Penalty
If you used a Peerceptiv workflow or set the options to allow late submissions and late penalties, then you can set the late penalty here. The default is for the late penalty to be 10 but you can change it on this screen. The penalty is deducted from the submission grade after it is calculated. If the submission is uploaded more than one minute after the deadline, it is considered to be one day late. You can waive the penalty for individuals after the assignment is over.
- Grade curve
This only applies to the submission grade of assignments with curved grading. A mean of 85 and a standard deviation of 10 has been shown to produce grades as valid and reliable as those by an expert reviewer. However, instructors can use the default settings or set their own mean and standard deviation.
If the assignment would typically generate high grades if graded by an instructor (for example, if it’s a low-stakes assignment where the students would likely generally receive an A on the assignment), consider raising the mean to 90 or even 95.
The reviewing grade for curved or benchmarked assignments has a mean of 90 and a standard deviation of 10. This cannot be edited.
- Grade weight
Set the amount each grading category will count towards the overall percentage grade. The default 40% submission grade, 40% reviewing grade, and 20% task grade has been shown to generate overall grades that are as valid and reliable as instructor grades.
Adjust the numerical percentage amounts on the right with the arrows or type in the desired percentages. The total must be 100.
12. Deadlines: Set the publication date (when students will be able to view the assignment), the deadline time, submission deadline, reviewing deadline, and feedback deadline. To edit these dates, click on the calendar, the end date, or the duration.
The publication date will automatically be set for tomorrow's date, but this can be changed once the assignment has been created. Set your publication date so that students cannot see it until you want them to see the assignment.
The deadline time is the time when each phase will end on the day set. This time is the same for all phases to reduce confusion.
Peerceptiv recommends allowing at least 2 days for each phase, with a longer reviewing phase for assignments that will take students a significant amount of time to complete the required reviews in a thoughtful manner.
13. Advanced Settings
- Convert document submissions to PDF is recommended for optimal reviewing experience. However, if the file submission is a spreadsheet, Powerpoint with audio files, zip file, video file, or other file format that does not convert to PDF, please uncheck this box.
- Send email notifications will remind students when a phase has begun, when there is 24 hours before a deadline and the student has not completed a task, and when the grades are released.
These notifications are also available in Peerceptiv by clicking on the bell icon on the right of the top navy bar. In-app notifications will be available even if off email notifications are turned off for an assignment.
If not all students are completing every assignment phase or if students are not completing all of the assignments set up in Peerceptiv, we recommend that you uncheck this setting.
14. Finish: Click Finish to finalize the settings and open the assignment in your course. You must click Finish every time that you make any changes in the settings editor or the changes will not be saved.
After the assignment is created, you can continue to edit the settings by clicking on the wheel icon at the upper left of the overview screen. Before the assignment is published, remember to add a rubric.
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.